Stimson v. Van Pelt
New York Supreme Court
MOTION Tby the defendant Yan Pelt, for a new trial, after a verdict for the plaintiff, at the circuit. Exceptions ordered to be heard, in the first instance, at General Term.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Mullin, J.
This action was brought to recover the price of a quantity of goods, alleged to" have been sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants, between the 23d of May and the 30th of July, 1866.
The complaint charges that the plaintiff sold and delivered the goods to the defendants as partners, under the firm name of “D. P. Dunham,” doing business at Auburn, in this state.' The defendant Dunham did not appear in the action. The defendant Yan Pelt appeared and answered, denying the complaint.
There is no doubt but that Dnnham purchased the goods, and the contest on the trial was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Draper v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Boynton v. SquiresNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. TheissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
- Lapinsky v. ColishAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908