Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Squires

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Cortland county court. Action by Fitz Boynton and another against Ophelia E. Squires and E. Frank Squires to recover for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment of the county court affirming a judgment rendered in a justice’s court in favor of plaintiffs, defendant Ophelia E. Squires appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court against the defendant and her husband, E. Frank Squires. The complaint was for goods sold and delivered. The main issue was whether the appellant was liable. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict against both defendants. The husband did not appeal. The plaintiffs were in the drug business, and the recovery was for paints and oils sold by plaintiffs at their store, and delivered to the two witnesses Galpin and Mullane in September, 1892, and taken by them onto a farm owned by the appellant, and there used in September, 1892, by the witness…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meeker v. . ClaghornNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Jones v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Foster v. . PerschNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Brumskill v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Cutter v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holden v. Kutscher, New York County Courts1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API