Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Theiss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant John Henry Theiss, from !a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Hew York, affirming a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff against the'defendants, upon the verdict, of a jury. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The complaint sets forth three causes of action, ..each of which is predicated upon an allegation that the defendants were, during the times therein mentioned, copartners doing business under the firm name of “ G. Theiss & Brother.” The first two causes of action are based on promissory notes for $211.87, and $445.51, respectively, signed “ G. Theiss & Brother,” and the third for goods sold and delivered, to the ¡amount of $33...
The.defendants answered separately, but. the answers -are similar ' in all respects, each substantially denying all material allegations of the complaint. Upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Stedeker v. . BernardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Brumskill v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Claflin v. ButterlyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Pruyn v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lapinsky v. ColishAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908