Legal Opinion

Turman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1930No. 8442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLY, O. J.

The state of Texas, acting through -its Attorney General, Robert Lee Bobbitt, and R. A. Weinert, district attorney of the Twenty-Pifth judicial district, of which his residence, Guadalupe dounty, is a component part, at the instance of the Railroad Commission of Texas, instituted this suit against appellant, a resident of Tarrant county, to recover of him the sum of $1,P00 for each and every day on which he has violated Rule No. 37, as provided in article 6036, Revised Civil Statutes. 1925, as amended by the Forty-First Legislature in its regular session in 1929, c. 313, § 4, and to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Cherryhomes v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hook v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. NailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. City of Groveton v. JosserandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Butler v. NailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Hunt Production Co. v. BurrageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Kenyon v. United Salt Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API