Cherryhomes v. Carter
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Montague. Tried below before the,Hon. F. E. Finer. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWillie, Chief Justice
This cause was submitted to the judge below for determination upon the law and the facts. At the time of *167submission there was a demurrer pending to the plea of usury set up by a portion of the defendants. The judge passed upon the validity of this plea, among other matters of law, and held that it was insufficient, because not sworn to by any one wishing to avail himself of the defence of usury. This answer was pleaded by all the defendants except Cherryhomes, as appears from the statement of the answer itself. It was sworn to by Cherryhomes, who not only did not join in the plea, but refused…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Gex v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Abilene Independent Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Interstate Amusement Co. v. Fred Fisher, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Turman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Nail v. ComptonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.