Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Elliott

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 24, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

At Law. Action by Ellsworth C. Irvine, receiver for the benefit of creditors, appointed in an action of F. M. Marriott, Consolidated, against the Columbus, Sandusky & Hocking Railroad Company and others, against Alfred S. Elliott. On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

This is an action of debt brought for the recovery from Alfred S. Elliott of $8,125, being the amount assessed against him by. the court of common pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, hereinafter called the court of common pleas, under his alleged statutory double liability as a stockholder of The Columbus, Sandusky and Hocking Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the railroad company, an insolvent Ohio corporation, with interest thereon. The case is before the.court on a demurrer to the declaration. By stipulation of counsel a paper marked “A” containing a copy of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  2. John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  3. Shriver v. Woodbine Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Klein v. Lionel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  5. Van Tuyl v. CarpenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API