Legal Opinion

Janinda v. Lanning

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1964No. 9362PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This is an action brought by respondents, (plaintiffs), as vendees, against appellants, (defendants) vendors, to rescind a contract for the purchase and sale of real property and to recover the amount paid thereunder.

Respondents in their complaint alleged that appellants fraudulently concealed material facts, which, had respondents had knowledge thereof they would not have entered into the contract; that such fraudulent concealment reacted to respondents’ injury, and effected reduction in value of the real property by rendering it undesirable and unsafe for rental purposes.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Obde v. SchlemeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Villalon v. BowenNevada Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Sowards v. RathbunIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API