Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Brownell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 20, 1957No. Nos. 13822, 13823PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

These are consolidated appeals lodged by two groups of intervenors in the corporate action commenced in 1948 by Societe Internationale, a Swiss corporation, formerly called I. G. Chemie, but now commonly known as Interhandel. Commencing in February 1942, the Attorney General or his predecessors issued a series of vesting orders by which, under the Trading with the Enemy Act,1 the Government had seized some 93% of the stock of General Aniline & Film Corporation (hereinafter called GAF), said to have been the property of foreign nationals or owned by or held for I. G.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales S.A. v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Kaufman v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. International Mortgage & Investment Corp. v. Von ClemmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Eric G. Kaufman v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Ernest Attenhofer v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Rogers v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  4. La Due & Co. v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API