Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 7, 1952No. 172PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Acting under § 5 (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act,1 the Alien Property Custodian vested in himself the American assets of Interhandel, a Swiss corporation.2 In-terhandel sued in the District Court to recover the assets. The Custodian3 answered alleging that the Swiss corporation was dominated and controlled by officers, agents, and stockholders who were engaged in a conspiracy with German nationals and with the German Government to *158operate the company’s business in their interests while we were at war with Germany. Petitioners, United States citizens who own stock in Interhandel, filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales S. A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  4. Textile Workers Union of America, CIO v. The Allendale Company, Hayward-Schuster Woolen Mills, Inc. v. The Allendale CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Reich v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API