Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S.A.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 14, 1960No. 15017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

This unique case brought by a Swiss holding company sometimes known as I. G. Chemie or Interhandel [plaintiff], was instituted in October, 1948 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), 40 Stat. 419, as amended, against the Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, and the Treasurer of the United States [herein Government], Hundreds of plaintiff’s stockholders intervened.1 Thereafter, many variously *270contested proceedings resulted in hearings before each of several District Judges. Chief Judge Laws was finally impelled, sua…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Dollar v. Land, Chairman, United States Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. In re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  3. Burgess v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Burgess v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API