United States v. Gary Mitsven
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:. Appellant, Gary Mitsven (“Mitsven”), appeals the district court’s imposition of supervised release as part of Mitsven’s sentence following his probation revocation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I.BACKGROUND
A federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida indicted Mitsven with several drug related charges. Mitsven pled guilty to one count of the indictment. The probation officer prepared a presen-tence investigation report (“PSI”), which indicated a sentencing guideline range of 21 to 27 months imprisonment. In March 2003, the district court sentenced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. William Joseph FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Christopher Alan AlmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lawrence PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Sandra CookCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Brian PlaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Velasquez VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Mark Anthony CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Audra RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Audra RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.