Legal Opinion
Lerner v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1982No. 9-68PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. BECKER, Judge.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Rule 5, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (F.R.A.P.), Paul Lerner, doing business as Lerner Oil Company (Lerner), petitions for permission of this Court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), to appeal from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court granting a motion of the respondent Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) for a partial summary judgment. For the reasons stated below we deny the petition of Lerner for leave to appeal from the interlocutory order.
Proceedings in the District Court
Petitioner Lerner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. First National Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Shell Oil Co. v. Nelson Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1980
- Petroleum for Contractors, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of New York v. HoytDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- Voss v. Lincoln Mall Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Lerner v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Coordinated Pre-trial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation M.D.L. No. 150Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pederson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.