Legal Opinion

People v. Lovelace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated May 27, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including, inter alia, the complainant’s grand jury testimony and other “reliable hearsay evidence” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Davis, 26…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. AwaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. SaleemiNew York Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LaRockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. MiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. DominieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API