Legal Opinion
People v. Awalt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), dated May 3, 2004, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). The County Court properly considered the grand jury testimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. Robert I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. LovelaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.