Legal Opinion

Hagy v. Premier Manufacturing Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1961No. Appeal, 153PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from an Order granting a preliminary mandatory injunction to compel Defendant Corporation, appellant herein, to allow Plaintiff Hagy to examine, under all the facts and circumstances here present, all of its corporate records and documents.

Motion to Quash

At the outset we are met with plaintiff’s motion to quash this appeal on the ground that the Order entered by the Court below is not appealable. It is horn-book law that an order granting or refusing a prelim inary injunction is appealable: Dozor Agency v. Rosenberg, 403 Pa. 237, 240, 169 A. 2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. SchnelbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Dozor Agency v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Kuhbach v. Irving Cut Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Crum v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Chester City School Authority v. Aberthaw Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. George v. SchirraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API