Legal Opinion

Rienecker v. Lampman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1939No. 2104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Chief Justice.

This cause comes here by direct appeal from a judgment of the district court of Big Horn County in an action wherein N. P. Rienecker was plaintiff and C. F. Lampman was defendant, and arose in consequence of injuries suffered by Rienecker in an automobile accident. He was not successful in the trial court and now asks that the judgment below be reversed as contrary to law and not sustained by the evidence. The action was tried to the court without a jury.

The material facts involved are not so very greatly in dispute and may be briefly stated thus: On or about two o’clock…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Branson v. RoelofszWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Nelson v. MittenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Czarnetzky v. BoothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. VukelicWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chandler v. DuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Peters v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Scoggin v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hill v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API