Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile and locomotive.
(See illustration [page 403] for the photograph of the scene where the accident hereinafter described occurred.)
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (respondent) the material facts are:
January 3, 1937, about 3 A. M., defendant corporation was operating a steam train with defendant Alverson as engineer. This train, which consisted of a locomotive and tender, two box cars and a caboose,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Guyer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lloyd v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Merlino v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Spendlove v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Rienecker v. LampmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.