Legal Opinion

Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1938No. Civ. No. 11815PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile and locomotive.

(See illustration [page 403] for the photograph of the scene where the accident hereinafter described occurred.)

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (respondent) the material facts are:

January 3, 1937, about 3 A. M., defendant corporation was operating a steam train with defendant Alverson as engineer. This train, which consisted of a locomotive and tender, two box cars and a caboose,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Guyer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Merlino v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Spendlove v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rienecker v. LampmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Heroux v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API