Legal Opinion
United Farmers Assn. v. Sakiota
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1935No. Civ. 9451PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.
The sole contention on this appeal is that the contract which was entered into between the parties did not create the relation of debtor and creditor but did create the relation of joint adventurers. All other questions in the case are incidental to and dependent upon this fundamental contention. If it falls, all fall.
The contract when boiled down reads as follows: “First: Grower (defendants-appellants) is the owner of a crop of celery which is now standing and growing on a certain land consisting of 50 acres more or less, which land is located at Sawtelle, California. Second: Company…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dempsey-Kearns Theatrical & Motion Picture Enterprises, Inc. v. PantagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Nowell v. OswaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Joe Balestrieri & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Enos v. Picacho Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Howard v. Societa Di Unione E Beneficenza ItalianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wiltsee v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.