Legal Opinion

Fire Assn. of Philadelphia v. Bonds

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee owns a house and lot in the city of Pocahontas, upon which he -had executed a mortgage to the Randolph County Bank to secure a loan of $300 made to him by the bank. The mortgage is not copied into the transcript, but it is admitted that it contained a clause requiring the mortgagor to insure the property in a sum sufficient to protect the loan made by the bank.

Appellee applied to and obtained from tbe appellant insurance company a policy covering tbe house in the-sum of $800, with additional insurance of $250 on tbe household goods. Tbis policy was issued January 13, 1924, by Judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. German Insurance v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. ParrishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Old American Insurance v. WexmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Ass'n v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. BattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. The Home Ins. Co. of New York v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Guardian Company v. Cleveland CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Willis-Reed Lumber Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API