Legal Opinion

Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance v. Roth

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 9, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is a suit on a fire insurance policy issued by the appellant insurance company. The property insured was described as two thousand or more bushels of rice, and it was consumed or damaged by fire. The policy contains the following provision: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed herein or added hereto, shall be void if the subject of insurance be personal property and be or become incumbered by a chattel mortgage. ’ ’

At the time of the fire there were two mortgages on the rice, one in favor of the First National Bank of DeWitt and another in favor of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Mississippi Life Insurance v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fire Assn. of Philadelphia v. BondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins. v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. BynumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. American Insurance Company v. MordicSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Highlands Insurance v. William Burris Masonry Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API