Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Batton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The appellant insurance company, hereinafter referred to as the company, issued a policy of fire insurance to appellee on his residence in the sum of $400, and on October 2-8, 1927, the building was totally destroyed by fire. At the request of the company’s local agent, appellee furnished an estimate of his loss in the sum of $1,363.89, and was then advised by the local agent that no other proof of loss would be required.
A few days after the fire an adjuster came to see appellee about his loss, -but the parties did not meet, and-on November 26, 1927, the adjuster wrote the local agent that,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fire Assn. of Philadelphia v. BondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Old American Insurance v. WexmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. HenningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the U. S. v. GordySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Continental Casualty Co. v. VardamanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- United States ex rel. Peevy v. Pensacola Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.