Legal Opinion
Holterman v. Holterman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2004PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
We are being asked in this matrimonial case to determine whether Supreme Court erred by declining to adjust defendant’s child support obligation to account for the distributive award payments he was obligated to pay plaintiff for her share of the future enhanced earnings attributable to his medical license. We conclude that Supreme Court did not err as a matter of law and in particular, under the circumstances of this case, did not abuse its discretion in determining the distributive award or in its application of the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA).
I
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- MATTER OF CASSANO v. CassanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Arvantides v. ArvantidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Grunfeld v. GrunfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Chamberlain v. ChamberlainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Fields v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Embury v. EmburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Carman v. CarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.