Legal Opinion

State v. Blood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1963No. 43,255PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is a criminal action in which appeal has been duly perfected from a conviction of grand larceny and burglary in the second degree. Conviction was based upon evidence of possession of stolen property by the appellant shortly after the theft.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether evidence admitted at the trial over the appellant’s objection was in fact obtained by an unlawful search and seizure.

Sometime between the hours of 6:00 p. m., December 16, 1961, and 1:30 a. m., December 17, 1961, the Mann Automatic Transmission…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Alcala v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Klockenbrink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API