Klockenbrink v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Justice.
Appellants were found guilty of commercial fishing for salmon during a closed period, of commercial fishing in closed waters, and of escaping from a peace officer while under lawful arrest. From an af-firmance by the Superior Court, appellants bring this appeal.
On the evening of Sunday, July 28, 1968, Fish and Game enforcement officers Stin-son and Chinander, student stream guards hired for the summer, were on stake-out at the Kalsin Bay area near Kodiak, watching for possible violations. At about 8:30 p.m. a gray boat came into view which Stinson observed with binoculars and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Daygee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.