Legal Opinion

Klockenbrink v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1970No. 1149PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Justice.

Appellants were found guilty of commercial fishing for salmon during a closed period, of commercial fishing in closed waters, and of escaping from a peace officer while under lawful arrest. From an af-firmance by the Superior Court, appellants bring this appeal.

On the evening of Sunday, July 28, 1968, Fish and Game enforcement officers Stin-son and Chinander, student stream guards hired for the summer, were on stake-out at the Kalsin Bay area near Kodiak, watching for possible violations. At about 8:30 p.m. a gray boat came into view which Stinson observed with binoculars and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Daygee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API