Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 2, 2009PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

Witness intimidation in cases involving gangs, drug racketeers, organized crime, and domestic violence has become a significant challenge to the criminal justice system. In this appeal, we must decide whether, under our Rules of Evidence, a witness’s hearsay statement implicating a defendant in a crime should be admissible, when through violence, intimidation, or other unlawful means, the defendant makes the witness unavailable to testify at trial.

We now hold that the time has come for New Jersey to follow the course taken by many other jurisdictions and codify a forfeiture-by-wrongdoing…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. State v. CabbellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. State v. Bruno Gibson (072257)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API