Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant brought both antitrust and business tort claims against respondents, who challenged appellant’s standing to assert the claims. The district court found that appellant had standing and granted respondents summary judgment on the claims. Appellant challenges the summary judgment; respondents notice review of the determination that appellant had standing. Because we conclude that appellant did not have standing to bring its claims against respondents, we reverse the district court determination that appellant had standing, vacate as moot the summary judgment for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Milk Products Antitrust Litigation. Rainy Lake One Stop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- William H. Sullivan II v. National Football League, & Members of the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Schiff v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006