Legal Opinion

Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1999No. C0-99-142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHULTZ, Judge. **

This case presents the question of whether an insured may settle a negligence claim with an out-of-state tortfeasor and later bring an uninsured motorist claim because the tortfeasor was insured for an amount below the Minnesota minimum. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the uninsured motorist carrier, concluding appellants were not entitled to recover under their uninsured motorist coverage after settling and receiving payment from the tortfea-sor’s liability carrier. The district court also concluded appellants, Mary Kay and William Ruddy,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API