Legal Opinion

Sincock v. Roman

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 16, 1964No. Civ. A. 2470PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The history of this litigation is set out in the decisions cited in the footnote. 1 Following the affirmation of our judgments by the Supreme Court in Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695, 84 S.Ct. 1449, 12 L.Ed.2d 620 (1964), the General Assembly of Delaware enacted two statutes, respectively on July 6 and July 8,1964, to reapportion Delaware in respect to the election of members of the General Assembly of Delaware. Not yet codified, the two statutes have been referred to throughout these proceedings and are referred to in this opinion as “S.B. 332” and “S.B. 336” 1a

S.B. 332 provides for a House…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kilgarlin v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
  2. Bush v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
  3. Sincock v. ObaraDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  4. Sincock v. GatelyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
  5. Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API