Legal Opinion

Kilgarlin v. Martin

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 2, 1966No. Civ. A. 63-H-390PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOEL, District Judge:

Preface

Plaintiffs ask this Court to abolish House Bill 195, Acts of the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, 1965, c. 351, which reapportions1 ******the House of Representatives of the State of Texas. Having won the first round in this Court but lost the second round in the Texas Legislature, plaintiffs return here for the third round of a now-typical reapportionment struggle.

The issue now is not whether, but how, to reapportion Texas for the election of its House of Representatives. Plaintiffs vigorously urge that all members of the House should, indeed must, be elected…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Kilgarlin v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Graves v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
  4. Smith v. CraddickTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Carstens v. LammDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API