Sincock v. Obara
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT IN RESPECT TO COSTS AND FEES
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
I
The present application is one for costs and fees 1 by the plaintiffs’ counsel, Vincent A. Theisen, Esquire.
The case at bar has a long history and is resuméd in the following opinions of this court: Sincock v. Terry, D.C., 207 F.Supp. 205; D.C., 210 F.Supp. 395; D.C., 210 F.Supp. 396 (1962); Sincock v. Duffy, D.C., 215 F.Supp. 169 (1963);. and Sincock v. Roman, D.C., 232 F.Supp. 844 (1964). More importantly, see the opinion of the Supreme Court in Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695, 84 S.Ct. 1449, 12 L.Ed.2d 620 (1964),…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roman v. SincockSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Hallmark Clinic v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1974
- Bond v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Faircloth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.