Legal Opinion
Bassett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1927No. 4920PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
Judgment was entered against plaintiffs in error, A. Pincolini and G. D. Madalena, for want of appearance or answer upon the return of scire facias. The persons named were sureties on a bail bond taken before a United States commissioner, the obligation of which was that one C. W. Bassett would appear in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and answer a charge of conspiracy; otherwise, that the principal and sureties would pay to the United States the sum of $10,000. The writ was issued on the 28th day of January, 1926. The return time fixed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shepard v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hollister v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Insley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. ZarafonitisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
- Collin County Nat. Bank of McKinney v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- La Grotta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Western Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933
- Manzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Howell v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.