Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 18, 1933No. Nos. 3900, 3901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AVIS, District Judge.

The two cases set forth in the title hereof are almost identical as to the facts involved, and briefs have been filed by the attorney for defendants, setting forth the same legal rea<sons.

Both defendants were included in one information, and were jointly engaged in the same alleged violation, and this memorandum will therefore apply to both eases.

The cases are submitted on scire facias proceedings on final hearing and on agreed statement of facts.

The docket entries show that defendants appeared on June 17, 1929, and pleaded not guilty. At sundry later dates, the entries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  2. Bassett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Moran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. United States v. PayneDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  5. Anduaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Grotta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. State v. SingletaryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. United States v. LutherDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API