Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 2008No. E042427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION1]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

When victim Ruth Michiel ran into financial difficulties, she was afraid that two houses she owned would go into foreclosure. Defendant Paul Stephen Martinez offered to help her; at his direction, she signed a stack of documents. Later, she learned that a trust deed had been recorded against one of the houses, purportedly to secure a $25,000 debt to defendant. Michiel did not deny signing the trust deed but denied doing so knowingly; moreover, the notary whose name appeared on it denied ever notarizing it.

Defendant was found guilty of forgery of the notary’s signature (count…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. People v. NederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SalmorinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. KenefickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. FallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API