Legal Opinion

City of Ardmore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1935No. 24746PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, filed suit in the district court of Carter county, Okla., on the 26th day of October, 1932, and, after demurrer -was sustained to said petition, filed in said court its amended petition on February 15, 1933, in which it sought to recover from the defendant in error, defendant below, $2,926, as penalty for failure of the defendant in error to properly maintain a street or road crossing in the city of Ardmore.

The facts as alleged in plaintiff’s amended petition show that M street, in the city of Ardmore, Okla., at the time of the construction of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Missouri, K. T.R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Ex Parte OldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. In Re Application of JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Anderson Hotels of Oklahoma, Inc. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API