Legal Opinion

Krenzer v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1896No. 17,654PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was an action for personal injuries, brought by appellant against appellee. The jury found for appellant in the sum of $4,000, and with their verdict returned answers to certain interrogatories. On motion óf appellee, the court gave judgment against appellant, upon the answers to interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict in his favor. The complaint was in three paragraphs. The material allegations were: That the appellee company was operating one of its locomotives upon and over one of the tracks of the Union Railway Company, known as the “Belt Railroad/* within the city of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. EmmelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McGuire v. . SpenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. FineIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. StevensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API