Legal Opinion
Thiel v. Veneman
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 14, 2012No. CV-09-168-BLG-RFCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge.
On October 12, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby entered her Findings and Recommendations in this case (Doc. # 53). Magistrate Judge Ostby recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).
Upon service of a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, a party has 14 days to file written objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In this…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Straw v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020