Legal Opinion
Arbitration No. Aaa13 v. Cargill Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 25, 1989No. 118PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
867 F.2d 130
1989 A.M.C. 644
In the Matter of ARBITRATION NO. AAA13-161-0511-85 UNDER the
GRAIN ARBITRATION RULES of American Arbitration
Association.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CARGILL INCORPORATED, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 118, Docket 88-7132.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Sept. 20, 1988.
Decided Jan. 25, 1989.
D.S. Sastri, Silver Spring, Md. (Krishna M. Vempaty, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.
John F. O'Connell, New York City (Burlingham, Underwood & Lord, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.
Before MESKILL, PIERCE and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MCI CONSTRUCTORS, LLC v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- McKesson Corporation, Dba: McKesson Drug Company v. Local 150 IbtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mangan v. Owens Truckmen, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Carroll v. FerroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.