Legal Opinion

Roark v. City of Caldwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1964No. 9364PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

The respondents, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, instituted this declaratory judgment action for a determination of the validity of an airport zoning ordinance adopted June 19, 1961, by appellant, City of Caldwell, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the City. This ordinance affected the property owned by the plaintiffs; after trial, the trial court held the ordinance to be unconstitutional, invalid and void, and entered judgment accordingly, from which judgment the City appealed.

The City in its brief cogently states the issue presented by this appeal to be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Village of Willoughby Hills v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API