Ford v. Arthur N.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
Arthur N. appeals from an order of the superior court, sitting as a juvenile court, sustaining a supplemental petition brought pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 777, 1 and committing him to the custody of the Youth Authority. He argues both that proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the facts constituting the misconduct alleged therein is necessary to sustain a supplemental petition when commitment of a ward to the Youth Authority is sought, and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain thé petition whether that standard or the “clear and convincing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Ronald E.California Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.