Legal Opinion

Ford v. Arthur N.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1976No. S.F. 23317PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Arthur N. appeals from an order of the superior court, sitting as a juvenile court, sustaining a supplemental petition brought pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 777, 1 and committing him to the custody of the Youth Authority. He argues both that proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the facts constituting the misconduct alleged therein is necessary to sustain a supplemental petition when commitment of a ward to the Youth Authority is sought, and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain thé petition whether that standard or the “clear and convincing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re Ronald E.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API