Legal Opinion
Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, PA
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 23, 1993No. 92-407PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
616 So.2d 523 (1993)
Daniel CONLEY, Appellant,
v.
SHUTTS & BOWEN, P.A., and Mark Bisbing, Appellees.
No. 92-407.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 23, 1993.
Rehearing Denied May 11, 1993.
Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.
Murai, Wald, Biondo & Moreno and Marianne A. Vos, Miami, for appellees.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
2Per curiam
Daniel Conley appeals an order dismissing with prejudice a legal malpractice action he filed against Shutts & Bowen, P.A., a law firm, and Mark Bisbing, an attorney employed by Shutts & Bowen.
Conley acted as the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Ralph v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Pennsylvania Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. SikesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Riccio v. SteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Rios v. McDermott, Will & EmeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and PontonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Lane v. ColdDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and PontonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- R.S.B. Ventures, Inc. v. BerlowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.