Legal Opinion
In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 2018No. A17-1210PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWorke, Judge
Appellants argue that the district court erred by vacating the chief administrative law judge's order approving the City of Proctor's annexation by ordinance. We reverse.
FACTS
In January 2013, respondents City of Duluth and Midway Township entered into an orderly annexation agreement (OA Agreement) and designated certain land in Midway as an Orderly Annexation Area. Midway abuts both Duluth and appellant City of Proctor. The OA Agreement divided the Orderly Annexation Area into three parcels identified as Parcel I, Parcel II, and Parcel III.
Julia Ann (Hovland) Savalas and George Hovland III…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019