Legal Opinion
In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 2019No. A17-1210PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MCKEIG, Justice.
*217Midway Township and the City of Duluth entered into an orderly annexation agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.0325 (2018) regarding certain designated property in Midway and governing future annexations of that property by Duluth. After the orderly annexation agreement took effect, the owners of some of the designated property petitioned the City of Proctor, a non-party to the agreement, to annex their property by ordinance pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.033 (2018). Proctor did so. The Chief Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") approved the annexation, but the district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Owens v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phillips v. Caliber Home LoansDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020