Legal Opinion
Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 13, 1993No. 92-581CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Thorpe Insulation Company (“Thorpe”), a non-party to this litigation, has moved to quash part of a subpoena duces tecum served upon it.1 The motion, which is opposed by defendant, is denied.
On August 30, 1993, Thorpe, one of the subcontractors on the project that is the subject of this litigation, received a subpoena duces tecum from defendant. Item 12(e) of the subpoena sought production of Thorpe’s year-end financial statements for the years 1987 to 1992. On October 5, defendant was allowed to review and mark for photocopying Thorpe’s records from the project. Included…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Francis S.L. Wang v. Paul Hsu C v. Chen Kwan Tao Li Lee and Li, a Partnership, D. Michael Clayton, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. SinghDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
- Liggett Group Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Home Insurance v. First National Bank of RomeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. Big Picture Loans, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- WM High Yield v. O'HANLONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
- Centrifugal Acquisition Corp. v. MoonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012