Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Baum

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1934No. 3974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Appellee, Baum, a resident of New Mexico, claiming to have been injured through the negligence of appellant, operating a line of railroad in Texas and New Mexico, commenced a damage suit in the courts of Texas under what is known as the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59), which gives him the right to maintain his cause of action at any point where the defendant may be doing business and where the courts will take jurisdiction thereof.

Appellant sought an injunction from the district court of Quay county, N. M., to restrain appellee from maintaining his suit in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Illinois Life Insurance v. PrentissIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Schendel v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Fraser v. State Savings BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. General Atomic Co. v. FelterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. VigorDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1936
  4. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. MilesTennessee Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API