Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Vigor

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 29, 1936No. 1198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNDERWOOD, District Judge.

On November 14, 1936, the plaintiff railroad company filed its verified bill of complaint herein seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from maintaining, carrying on, or prosecuting in any way, any action or proceeding in Kentucky or Indiana, or elsewhere than in Ohio against the plaintiff herein to recover damages growing out of the death of defendant’s decedent, Harry F. Chilcott. In particular, plaintiff seeks to restrain said defendant from proceeding with any such suit in the states of Indiana and Kentucky.

Plaintiff filed its application for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Schendel v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Trapp v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baltimore & OR Co. v. ClemDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API