Legal Opinion

Schendel v. McGee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1924No. 253PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

This is an original action in this court, asking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to reinstate upon the calendar and docket of the United States' District Court of the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, the case of A. D. Schendel, Special Administrator of the Estate of Andrew J Baker, Deceased, v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St Paul Railway Company, and to hear, try, and have the cause determined on its merits.

The circumstances giving rise to this application for writ of mandamus extend over a considerable period of time and embrace a' number of court actions.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McClenachan v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API