Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. State of Minn.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1986No. 3-81-538PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

ALSOP, Chief Judge.

The above-entitled matter came before the court for trial from February 10, 1986, until March 13, 1986, and for argument on June 11, 1986. Having considered the evidence and being fully advised in the premises, the court makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. Introduction

1. Plaintiffs Jane Hodgson, M.D., and Arthur Horowitz, M.D., are licensed physicians engaged in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology, including the performing of abortions, in Minnesota.

2. Plaintiff Meadowbrook Women’s Clinic, P.A., provides birth control,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Planned Parenthood Of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Planned Parenthood v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Francis X. Bellotti, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Cleveland Surgi-Center, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API