Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1978No. 22465PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

Anthony Bowden and Taurus International, a partnership, have attempted to appeal from an order denying a motion to quash certain writs of garnishment. Our clerk has declined to file the appeal on the ground that the order is interlocutory and not appealable. The proposed appellants have filed a “motion to file appeal” with a supporting argument. We conclude that we have no jurisdiction, and, accordingly, we deny the motion.

Movants acknowledge that the order appealed from is interlocutory, and they seek to invoke the procedure for appeals of interlocutory orders…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Henderson v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Craft v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Craft v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Robert Epega D/B/A Million Dollar Transportation, LLC v. Bruckner Truck Sales and Volvo Financial Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API