Diaz v. PHOENIX LUBRICATION SERVICE, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 During a routine oil change and service job, did Phoenix Lubrication Service, Inc., dba Jiffy Lube (“Jiffy Lube”) owe Plaintiffs a duty to perform a safety inspection of the tires of Plaintiffs’ vehicle and to warn of any dangerous tread wear? We answer this question in the negative, and we therefore affirm summary judgment in favor of Jiffy Lube.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On October 30, 2004, Plaintiff Joseph Bryant Diaz (“Bryant”) took the Volvo owned by his parents, Plaintiffs Joseph Diaz, Jr. and Patricia Diaz, to a Jiffy Lube for an oil change. The oil change service…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2010
- LA FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC. v. MayerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Gilbert Tuscany Lender, LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Alcombrack v. CiccarelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.