Legal Opinion

Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2010No. CV-09-0117-PRPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 The “economic loss doctrine” bars plaintiffs, in certain circumstances, from recovering economic damages in tort. This Court has previously applied the doctrine only to products liability claims. Today we apply the doctrine in a construction defect case and hold that a property owner is limited to its contractual remedies when an architect’s negligent design causes economic loss but no physical injury to persons or other property.

I

¶2 Because the superior court dismissed this action pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), we assume the complaint’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Community Bank of Trenton v. Schnuck Markets, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Cook v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API